How General-Purpose Components Can Speed Embedded-System Design
Key Highlights
- General-purpose components can help engineers speed embedded-system design by allowing proven circuits to be reused across product generations.
- Reliable component availability can reduce redesign risk and help engineering teams keep development schedules on track as products evolve.
- As embedded systems become more complex, designers must balance component performance and cost while considering long-term availability.
- A broad portfolio of proven analog and embedded components can simplify part selection and give engineers more time to focus on differentiated product features and innovation.
Watch the full interview.
Check out the entire one-on-one conversation via QuickChat video with Alix and Mayrim to learn more.
General-purpose components can simplify embedded-system design when engineers can carry proven circuits forward and count on the parts behind them. That leaves more development time for what differentiates the next product.
Electronic Design spoke with Mayrim Verdejo, product line manager at Texas Instruments, about the pressures making embedded design more complex and what engineers should consider when choosing the components they build around.
ED: When you think about the state of the marketplace, how do you feel about embedded systems and these complex products that we’re working with today?
Plug in to our podcast.
If you want to learn more about how general-purpose components can speed embedded-system design, listen to the full interview with Alix and Mayrim on our podcast.
Verdejo: What’s interesting about the market today is that complexity is increasing, but customers have less time to manage that complexity. And I think that’s the biggest challenge. They are expected to add more functionality, innovate faster, and then get products to market sooner.
That’s what makes a strong foundation even more important. Designers need to have components they can trust for all their essential functions. So, think of power, sensing, signal conditioning, control, timing — without having to start from scratch every time.
A strong general-purpose portfolio provides that foundation and simplifies the design process for engineers. It allows them to spend more time innovating and working on their true differentiated product.
ED: There are trends that you have to follow. Everything’s got to have wireless in it nowadays. Everything’s got to have sensor integration. What market trends are driving this high level of integration?
Verdejo: Autonomous vehicles, AI, next-generation medical equipment all generate a lot of excitement, but they need to have very reliable building blocks.
Underneath that technology, you still have hundreds of fundamental functions that need reliable and proven components. And this is where the building blocks come into play. Yes, there are big drivers in the market, big innovations like data centers, that are driving this. But at the end of the day, it comes down to all the small functions that are needed to make these complex products.
ED: If you talk about the basics, what would you consider the basics?
Verdejo: In my role and across my entire career at TI, I have the opportunity to travel, visit hundreds of customers — thousands, possibly — around the world.
And when I go out there, one of the biggest challenges that I constantly hear system designers talk about is finding the right part for every function on their system. They are balancing performance, cost, the design time they spend on it, and the availability of the product. Is this product going to be available in the long term? Is the supply chain reliable?
So, they need to know not only that the part works for their design today, but that they can confidently build around it in the future.
ED: How would you contrast your offerings from what is available from your competition?
Verdejo: Number one is the breadth of our portfolio. Look at TI’s general-purpose portfolio across analog and embedded — we have thousands of products, maybe more than 100 categories, that we’re able to offer. That provides the customer with flexibility to pick between performance and cost.
Number two is the ease of design. We have application support; we have application notes that teach the customer how to use our part in their specific system. We have easy-to-use tools. We create products that are pin-to-pin to commodity products. So, if they’re using a competitor product, they’re able to use ours and then have a second source, and then increase their manufacturing flow and get their products to market faster.
And then the third area that we like to emphasize is our quality. Each of our products has a product cycle for development, and then the qualification portion is the one that takes the most time.
We want to make sure you have our part in your board. You don’t have to worry about having to change this part in 10 years. This is a commitment that we have with our customers, and we take it very seriously.
ED: You could have the greatest microcontroller on the planet, but if your wireless connectivity has bandwidth issues or issues of any nature, it’s not going to work the way it’s designed, right?
Verdejo: That’s correct. And then think of when you talk to customers; usually, when they have a design from one generation to the next, they reuse the circuits. For voltage sensing, they use the same circuit, and they tend to reuse the same part.
If you give a part that is not reliable or not available in the market, or you’re not able to supply it whenever they have the demand, how do they move faster? How are they able to innovate faster?
So, I think that what we’re providing at Texas Instruments is that availability, that quality, and that peace of mind for the customer. Ultimately, a strong general-purpose portfolio helps accelerate innovation. I tell this to my employees and my customers because without those building blocks, you really cannot move fast. Basically, your development slows down.
Watch the Video.
Listen to the Podcast.
To learn more about Texas Instruments' solutions, please visit the links below:
[Product] General-Purpose Portfolio
[Blog] The Chips That Change The World
[Resources] Educational Resources
Sponsored by:
About the Author
Alix Paultre
Editor-at-Large, Electronic Design
An Army veteran, Alix Paultre was a signals intelligence soldier on the East/West German border in the early ‘80s, and eventually wound up helping launch and run a publication on consumer electronics for the US military stationed in Europe. Alix first began in this industry in 1998 at Electronic Products magazine, and since then has worked for a variety of publications in the embedded electronic engineering space. Alix currently lives in Wiesbaden, Germany.
Also check out his YouTube watch-collecting channel, Talking Timepieces.
Comment About the Article
To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of Electronic Design, create an account today!
Leaders relevant to this article:
Facts Only
General-purpose components allow engineers to reuse proven circuits across product generations.
Reliable component availability reduces redesign risk and helps keep development schedules on track.
A broad portfolio simplifies part selection for engineers.
The foundation provided by general-purpose components allows designers to focus time on differentiated product features and innovation.
System designers face challenges balancing component performance, cost, design time, and availability.
Market trends include increased integration of wireless and sensor functionality.
Customers seek components that are reliable and available for the long term.
The portfolio's strength offers flexibility in choosing between performance and cost.
Providers emphasize product cycle development to ensure long-term availability.
Executive Summary
General-purpose components enable embedded system design acceleration by allowing engineers to reuse proven circuits across product generations, which reduces redesign risk and maintains development schedules. This reliance on a broad portfolio of established analog and embedded parts simplifies the selection process, allowing engineers to focus time and resources on differentiating product features and innovation. The complexity of modern embedded systems necessitates a strong foundation of reliable building blocks—covering power, sensing, signal conditioning, control, and timing—to manage increasing customer demands for faster innovation and market entry.
The need for robust components is driven by market trends such as the integration of wireless capabilities and sensor integration across sectors like autonomous vehicles and medical equipment. Reliability and long-term availability are critical considerations for system designers balancing performance, cost, design time, and supply chain security when selecting parts. Companies provide this foundation through portfolio breadth, application support, and a commitment to product lifecycles, aiming to deliver peace of mind that accelerates customer innovation.
Full Take
The narrative centers on the tension between accelerating market demands for innovation and the necessity of maintaining robust, long-term supply chain reliability within embedded systems design. The core insight is that complexity increases faster than the time available for management; therefore, standardized, high-quality building blocks act as an accelerator rather than a bottleneck. This pattern suggests that when external pressures demand speed—like in autonomous vehicles or AI integration—the market implicitly values predictability and risk reduction above incremental feature development.
The implied assumption is that historical component reliability translates directly into future system success; however, the discussion pivots to how suppliers maintain this promise through portfolio strategy (breadth, application support) rather than just offering individual components. The pattern suggests that competitive advantage in complex design environments shifts from mere technological superiority to assured supply chain stability and design ease. The implication is that investing in a comprehensive, reliable ecosystem for foundational components mitigates systemic risk imposed by rapid feature layering demanded by the market.
The missing perspective involves explicitly quantifying the trade-off between short-term innovation gains achieved by leveraging reusable parts versus the long-term costs associated with supply chain rigidity or technological obsolescence if the assumed reliability falters over extended product lifecycles. What mechanisms exist to ensure that the "peace of mind" derived from portfolio breadth translates into an actual, verifiable advantage in time-to-market when component availability becomes highly volatile?
Sentinel — Human
The text appears to be a legitimate journalistic piece synthesizing expert commentary on the role of general-purpose components in accelerating embedded system design, supported by an interview with an industry manager.