TL;DR
- The belief that OT networks are too fragile to test is an oversimplification. Most of the devices where the real security risk sits are robust enough for conventional testing techniques.
- A staged, risk-averse methodology lets us start with zero-risk techniques and progress only when devices have been shown to tolerate them.
- Whether a system is operational or in shutdown changes what we...
The strongest version of this narrative is that responsible penetration testing of OT networks is not only possible but necessary. The argument is well-supported by years of practical experience across multiple industries, demonstrating that a staged, risk-averse approach can effectively identify vulnerabilities without causing harm. The source acknowledges the genuine sensitivity of some low-level devices but rightly points out that the most significant security risks often lie in higher-level ...
